نقش طبقه‌بندی تجدیدنظرشدة بلوم در تحلیل محتوای فصل تابع کتاب درسی ریاضی دهم (ریاضی و تجربی): مطالعه ای فراترکیبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد تمام آموزش ریاضی ، ریاضی کاربردی، علوم ریاضی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد،

2 معلم و کارشناسی ارشد و محقق آموزش ریاضی، ریاضی کاربردی، علوم ریاضی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد،

3 1 معلم و دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آموزش ریاضی، ریاضی کاربردی، علوم ریاضی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد،

10.48310/jcdr.2025.20256.1211

چکیده

پیشینه و اهداف: تحلیل  کتاب‌ها بر اساس مدل‌های آموزشی می‌تواند به توسعة مهارت‌های شناختی و فراشناختی دانش‌آموزان کمک کند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل محتوا فصل تابع کتاب درسی ریاضی  پایة دهم(رشته ریاضی و تجربی) در چارچوب طبقه‌بندی تجدیدنظرشدة بلوم صورت گرفت. روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر توصیفی- تحلیلی است که برای انجام آن از روش تحلیل محتوا استفاده شد. هدف اصلی،  درک عمیق‌تر موضوع مورد بررسی از طریق شناسایی الگوها، روابط و تفاوت‌های درون داده‌ها است. واحد تحلیل این پژوهش فعالیت‌ها، کار ‌در‌کلاس‌ها، مثال‌ها و تمرین‌هاست که برای به­دست آوردن نتایج قابل اعتماد کل محتوای فصل تابع کتاب درسی ریاضی دهم چاپ  1403 انتخاب شده است. در این پژوهش، هر یک از سؤالات، به یکی از سطوح شناختی نسبت داده شد. به منظور تحلیل دقیق‌تر و انسجام داده‌ها، اطلاعات توسط جدول فراوانی و نمودار دایره­ای سازماندهی شد. یافته­ها: بررسی­ها نشان داد که در کل به‌طور تقریبی: 7/3 درصد سؤالات مربوط به سطح به‌یادآوردن، 9/32 درصد مربوط به سطح فهمیدن، 9/43 درصد  مربوط به سطح به‌کاربستن، 11 درصد مربوط به سطح تحلیل‌کردن، 7/3 درصد مربوط به سطح ارزیابی‌کردن و 9/4 درصد سؤالات مربوط به سطح ایجادکردن است. نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به یافته‌ها می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که بیشتر سؤالات، مربوط به سطوح پایین شناختی (به‌یادآوردن، فهمیدن و به‌کاربستن) است و مؤلفان کتاب توجه کمتری به سطوح بالای شناختی (تحلیل‌کردن، ارزیابی‌کردن و ایجادکردن) داشته‌اند. بنابراین توصیه می‌شود که در برنامة ‌درسی ریاضی و در طراحی سؤالات، تأکید بیشتری بر استفاده از سؤالاتی که سطوح بالای شناختی را فعال می‌سازند، صورت پذیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


References
Adhikari, Y. (2024). a review of revised bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Education Review Office. DOI: 10.3126/erjv1i1.82852
Akker, J. V. D. (2007). Curriculum design research. In Plomp, T. & Nieveen, Nienke (eds.) An introduction to educational design research. Proceeding of the seminar conducted at the east China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China).
Alamolhodae, H., Alizade, M. (2023). Principles of mathematics education. Mashhad: Nama. ]In Persian[.
Aliakbari, Z., Poorkrimi, J. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Curriculum Design: A Meta-Synthesis Study. Journal of research in curriculum studies, 4(2), 147-162. DOI: 10.48310/JCDR.2025.18637.1130]In Persian[.
Amyari, M. (2021). A review of the emergence and evolution of the concept of function. Towards Mathematical Sciences, 1(1), 14-23. ]In Persian.[ DOI: 10.22067/tmsj.2021.39660]In Persian[.
Apriangi, M. Y., Hadiansah, H., & Paujiah, E. (2025). Analysis of Biology Problems In Grade X Science Textbooks Based On Bloom's Taxonomy On Anderson's Revision And Communication Skills. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 4(1), 1003-1009. DOI: 10.58344/jiiv4i1.6189    
Ezatti, M., Faraji, H. (2025). Content Analysis of Textbook Calculus 2 (Mathematics and Physics): Evaluation by Bloom's Cognitive Taxonomy. The International Journal of Learning Space Studies (IJLSS), 2(4),72-79. DOI: 10.22034/lss.2025.498202.1031  ]In Persian[.
 
Babayi, M., Zahedbabalan, A., Moeinikia, M., Khaleqkhah, A. (2017). Path analysis model of the relationships between learning strategies and test anxiety with mathematics learning of secondary school students. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(45), 163-181. DOI: 10.22054/jep.2017.8149 ]In Persian[.
Coleman, V. M. (2013). National music education standards and adherence to Bloom’s revised taxonomy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, US.
Delavar, A. (2012). Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Tehran: Virayesh. ]In Persian[.
Delavari, A. (2021). Content analysis of the ninth grade math textbook with the focus on
math tasks. University of Tehran, Dissertation in MA in Mathematics, Faculty of  Science. [In Persian].
Divsar, H., Jafarigohar, M. (2013). Evaluation of English Language Teaching Curricula at Undergraduate and Graduate Levels Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Research and Academic Textbook Writing, 32 (18), 73-99DOI: 20.1001.1.26767503.1393.18.32.4.2. ]In Persian[.  
Fitri, M. F., Qadar, R., & Hakim, A. (2024). Bontang City Physics Teachers' Understanding of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive and Knowledge Dimensions in Physics Questions. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 7(2), 311-321. DOI: 10.37891/kpejv7i2.559
Frust, E. (1994). Bloom’s Taxonomy: Philosophical and Educational Issues. In Anderson, L. and Sosniak, L. (Eds.) Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective (pp. 28-40) Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Green, K. H. Matching functions and graphs at multiple levels of bloom’s revised taxonomy. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies 20:3 (2010), 15 pages. DOI: 10.1080/10511970802207212
Hafezi, R. (2023). Content analysis of physics textbook questions for the 10th, 11th, and 12th grades of high school based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. University of Tehran, Dissertation in MA in physics, Faculty of  Science. [In Persian].
Hajihosseinloo, Kh., Khaleqkhah, A., Zahidbabalan, A., Moeinikia, M. (2017). The effect of cooperative learning with progress groups on students' self-efficacy and mathematical self-concept. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(43), 119-139. DOI: 10.22054/jep.2017.7764]In Persian[.
Hamidizadeh, K.,  Chezani Sharahi A., Ebrahimi A. (2024). Analysis of the content of English language tex books for the first year of high school based on Fog's readability formula. The Journal of research in curriculum studies (JRCS), 3(2). 11-25DOI: 10.48310/jcdr.2024.15884.1084. ]In Persian.[
Heshmatifar, N., Karimimoonaghi H., Ahmadi S. (2022). Content Analysis (Research Technique or Method?): A Systematic Narrative Review, Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 29(6):756-768. ]in Persian.[ DOI: 0000-0003-0496-2306
Heydari, A. (2024). Analyzing the Writing Tasks of Persian Writing Textbooks Used at Primary Schools (4th and 5th Grades). Journal of research in curriculum studies, 4(6), 1-13. DOI: 10.48310/jcdr.2024.15294.1075 ]In Persian.[
Jafari, F. (2020). Comparison of Mathematical Content Analysis of First Secondary School in Two Classes of Normal and Talented Schools Using William Rumi Technique and Bloom's Cognitive Domain. University of Kerman. Dissertation in MA in Mathematics. Faculty of Mathematics and Computer.] In Persian[.
Jafari, T. (2010). Content analysis of questions in second and third grade high school mathematics textbooks in the field of literature and humanities based on Bloom's revised taxonomy in the cognitive domain. University of  Tehran. Dissertation in MA in Psychology. Faculty of  Psychology and Educational Sciences.] In Persian[.
Kolahdouz, F., Hassanianbasari, SH. (2024). Investigating 11th grade students' understanding of the concept of function by using problem posing, The Journal of Research in mathematics education, 3(1), 71-92. DOI: 10.48310/RME.2024.16185.1083 ]In Persian.[
Kreitzer, A. and Madaus, G. (1994). “Empirical Investigations of the Hierarchical Structure of the Taxonomy.” In Anderson, L. and Sosniak, L. (Eds.) Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty year Retrospective (pp.64-81). Chiacago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Mizbani, M., Salehi, H., Tabatabaei, O., & Talebinejad, M. (2023). Textbook Evaluation Based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy: Iranian Senior High School Textbook in Focus. Language and Translation, 13(1), 85-99. DOI: 10.30495/ttlt.2023.698908]in Persian.[
Moghadam, k. (2018). Content Analysis of Integral Topic of Year 12 Differential and Integral
Calculas Text Book Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. University of Mashhad. Dissertation in MA in Mathematics. Faculty of Mathematics.]In Persian[.
Nejatianbostani, H., Pahlevannejad, M., Ghansoli, B., Alizade, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of the content of two educational sets of Azfa based on Bloom's modified taxonomy in the cognitive domain (scientific-research article). Journal of Persian Language Teaching to Non-Persian Speakers, 10(2), 285-304. ]In Persian[. DOI: 10.30479/jtpsol.2022.16711.1571
Osman, A. (2016). A benchmark collection for program objectives mapping to abet outcomes: Accreditation. Master’s thesis, Thamar University.
Radmehr, F., Alamolhodae, H. (2012). Revised Bloom Taxonomy and its Application for Mathematics Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Development. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.), Vol.6 (24), 2012, 183 -202. ]In Persian[.
Radmehr, F., Dreak, M.  )2017). Revised bloom’s taxonomy and integral calculus: unpacking the knowledge dimension. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 48:8, 1206–1224. DOI:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1321796]in Persian.[
Rasuli, G., Keyhan, J. (2024). Designing a curriculum model based on emotional education with a brain education approach. Journal of research in curriculum studies, 3(2), 119-136. DOI: 10.48310/jcdr.2024.15853.1083]in Persian.[
Rasuli, M, Amiratashani, Z. (2011). Content analysis with a textbooks approach. Tehran: Jameshenasan. ]In Persian[.
Reyhaani, E., Sharifi, Z., Soltani, M. (2016). Misunderstandings about the Concept of Limit among High School Seniors. Quarterly Journal of Education and Training, 32 (4) :41-66 DOI: 20.1001.1.10174133.1395.32.4.3.5. ]In Persian[.
Sabze, B., Fathei, M., Hasanlou, s. (2024). The Effectiveness of Artistic Activities (Performance, Poetry Reading and Storytelling) in Learning the Concepts of Subtraction in Math Lessons. JNACE, 6(4): 246-260. DOI: 10.22034/NAES.2024.473023.1517]In Persian.[
 
Samali, M. (2017). Content Analysis of the Ninth Grade Math Textbook Published in 1394 Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in Cognitive Domain. University of  Bandarabbas, Dissertation in MA in Mathematics, Faculty of  Science. [In Persian].
Samsudi, M., Gafrillia, A. L., & Hazarika, A. (2024). Bloom Anderson's Taxonomy-Based Cognitive Level Analysis of Grade10 Interactive Mathematics Book Questions. Journal of Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 1(2), 111-119. DOI: 10.22219/jtlmv1i2.28783
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., Hejazi, A. (2008). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah. ]In Persian[.
Seyf, A. (2024). Modern educational psychology. Tehran: Doran. ]In Persian[.
Shabani, H. (2015). Educational and training skils. Tehran: Samt. ]In Persian[.
Shariatmadari, A. (2006). Some basic topics in lesson planning. Tehran: Samt. ]In Persian[.
Taghizade, Z., Ebadi, A., Montazeri, A., Shahvari, Z., Tavousi, M., Bagherzade, R. (2017). Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh, 16 (3) :343-357. ]In Persian[. DOI: ‎ 20.1001.1.16807626.1396.16.4.5.8
Tofighi, M. (2008). A study of second-grade students' misunderstandings of the concept of function in the city of Estahban in the academic year 2007-2008. University of Tehran, Dissertation in MA in Mathematics, Faculty of  Science. [In Persian].        
Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: from teachers perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5(9), 508-517.
Trujillo, M., Atarés, L., Canet, M. J., Pérez-Pascual, M. A. (2023). learning difficulties with he concept of function in maths: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 495. DOI:  10.3390/educsci13050495
Vakilian, M. (2022). Teaching methods and techiques. Tehran: Payamnoor. ]In Persian[.
Zarei, Z. (2019). Content analysis of the 12th grade math textbook using the Anderson-Kratwell method. Journal of Mathematical Education Development, 37 (1), 3-6. ]In Persian[.
Zaresefat, S,.Dehghani, M,.Hakimzade, R,.Karami, M,.Salehi, K. (2018). Null Curricula for the Professional Development of Faculty Members of Iranian Universities: Ferdowsi University, Iran. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, Vol.9, No.17,183 -216. ]In Persian[.