کارایی کیفیت دانش محتوای تربیتی فناورانه (TPACK) معلمان در استفاده از یادگیری اکتشافی هدایت‌شده در آموزش ابتدایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه آموزش ریاضی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، کد پستی 889-14665،تهران، ایران

چکیده

پیشینه و اهداف: هدف از انجام این پژوهش کارایی کیفیت دانش محتوای تربیتی فناورانه معلمان در استفاده از یادگیری اکتشافی هدایت‌شده در آموزش ابتدایی در مدارس ابتدایی شهر بندرعباس بوده است. روش‌ها‌: این تحقیق از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی بوده و جامعه آماری، شامل 10 نفر از معلمان ابتدایی پایه چهارم و همچنین 72 نفر از دانش آموزان دختر پایه چهارم که از طریق نمونه گیری چند مرحله ای و تصادفی در حجم نمونه قرار گرفتند. برای انجام این تحقیق ابتدا از پرسشنامه تلفیق فناوری (اشمیت و همکاران،2009) که هفت بعد دانش فناوری، دانش پداگوژی، دانش محتوایی، دانش محتوایی فناوری؛ دانش محتوایی پداگوژی، پداگوژیکی فناوری دانش محتوایی/تربیتی و فناوری به عنوان ابزار پژوهش استفاده شد. پرسشنامه سبک تلفیقی فناوری توسط معلمان تکمیل و طرح درس محقق ساخته ریاضی پایه جهارم در مدت زمان 50 دقیقه تدوین شد و سپس به مدت پنج هفته و هر هفته دو جلسه آموزش یادگیری اکتشافی هدایت شده در کلاس اجرا گردید. برای سنجش پایایی از روش آلفای کرونباخ (با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS) استفاده گردید که پایایی پرسشنامه 0/89به دست آمد. فرض ضریب همبستگی پیرسون – رگرسیون چند متغیری با حداکثر سطح معناداری 0/05 و با نرم افزار SPSS انجام شده است. یافته‌ها: نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که رابطه تمام مولفه های دانش محتوای تربیتی فناورانه با آموزش یادگیری اکتشافی هدایت شده دانش آموزان معنی دار است. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه نشان می‌دهد که کارایی کیفیت دانش محتوای تربیتی فناورنه معلمان تأثیر مستقیمی بر موفقیت یادگیری اکتشافی هدایت‌شده در دوره ابتدایی دارد..

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


1.Abdollahpour, S., & Eissazadeh, B. M. (2018). Studying the effect of the exploratory approach on students' creativity and academic achievement in elementary science lessons. In Second Iranian Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Sociology. [in Persian]
2.Adli, F., Agha Soleimani, H., Amini Shad, M., Fazel, M., & Sofi, F. (2015). Improving the professional competence of teachers (PCK Content Knowledge of Education and Training). Quarterly Journal of New Strategies for Teacher Training (Tarbit Moallem Fakor), 1(1), 79-87. [in Persian]
3.Adibnia, A. (2010). Methods and techniques of teaching experimental sciences in elementary school. Shushtar: Islamic Azad University, Research Assistant. [in Persian]
4.Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning. New York: Routledge.
5.Azam, S. (2020). Locating personal pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers within stories of teaching force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1907.
6.Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
7.Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180.
8.Brijlall, D. (2014). Exploring the pedagogical content knowledge for teaching probability in middle school: A South African case study. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 719-726.
9.Bugueño, W. M. (2013). Using TPACK to promote effective language teaching in an ESL/EFL classroom. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/150
10.Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers’ TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model (STLDM). Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 114-129.
11.De Cecco, J. P. (1968). The psychology of learning and instruction: Educational psychology.
12.Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting students' learning in genetics with the learning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259-280.
13.Dumitraşcu, D. (2009). Integration of guided discovery in the teaching of real analysis. Primus, 19(4), 370-380.
14.Fauzi, I., & Khusuma, I. H. S. (2020). Teachers’ elementary school in online learning of COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 58-70.
15.Gomez, J. C. (2020). Development of EFL teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through action research in a master’s program. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 533-55216.Karamipour, M.R. (2016). From pedagogy to educational leadership. Educational Technology Development Monthly, 31 (8), 38-41. [in persian].
16.Karamipour, M. R. (2016). From pedagogy to educational leadership. Educational Technology Development Monthly, 31(8), 38-41. [in Persian]
17.Kiani Sam, M., & Nematzadeh, L. (2015). Comparing the effects of exploratory and metacognitive education on academic achievement and motivation for progress in science subjects of fourth grade elementary school students in Masjed-e-Suleiman city, Second National Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences. [in Persian]
18.Kumala, F. N., Ghufron, A., & Pujiastuti, P. (2022). Elementary school teachers' TPACK profile in science teaching based on demographic factors. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4).
19.Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
20.Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
21.Kovarik, K. (2008). Mathematics educators' and teachers' perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Columbia University.
22.T., Shelly, C., & Zimmerman, R. (2007). Putting inquiry teaching to the test: Enhancing learning in college botany. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 62.
23.Lehiste, P. (2015). The impact of a professional development program on in-service teachers’ TPACK: A study from Estonia. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 66(1), 18-28. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=955078.
24.Maker, C. J., Jo, S., & Muammar, O. M. (2008). Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model, a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 402-417.
25.Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019, February). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 498-503). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114.
26.Maleki, H. (2011). Lesson Planning (Practical Guide) (17th ed.). Mashhad: Payam Andisheh Publications. [in Persian]
27.Mahler, D., Bock, D., & Schauber, S. (2024). Using longitudinal models to describe preservice science teachers’ development of content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, 1-12.
28.Maryani, I., & Martaningsih, S. T. (2015). Correlation between teacher's PCK (pedagogical content knowledge) and student's motivation in primary school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(1), 38-44.
29.Mohammadi, J. (2006). Survey of middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge. Paper presented at the 8th Iranian Mathematics Education Conference. [in Persian]
30.Mok, I. A. C., & Park, Y. H. (2022). Integrating research into practice: The growth of collective pedagogical content knowledge for primary mathematics via lesson study. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(2), 187-203.
31.Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
32.Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 49.
33.Mupita, J., Widiaty, I., & Abdullah, A. G. (2018, November). How important is technological, pedagogical, content knowledge? A literature review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 434, No. 1, p
34.Oyediran, W. O., Omoare, A. M., Owoyemi, M. A., Adejobi, A. O., & Fasasi, R. B. (2020). Prospects and limitations of e-learning application in private tertiary institutions amidst COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Heliyon, 6(11), 1-8.
35.Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
36.Rasmitadila, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109.
37.Sarkar, M., & Gutierrez-Bucheli, L. (2024). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, 1-13.
38.Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110.
39.Seyyedkalan, S., & Mazharpour, D. (2024). A systematic review of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of EFL teachers. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 14(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2024.372007.1097.
40.Shabanifar, S. (2012). Investigating the mathematical knowledge of mathematics teachers based on their performance in correcting students' exam papers. Paper presented at the Sixth National Education Conference, May 2014. [in Persian]
41.Shabanifar, S. (2012). Investigating the mathematical knowledge of mathematics teachers from the perspective of their approach to students' errors. Paper presented at the Sixth National Education Conference, Fifth National Education Conference, May 2013. [in Persian]
42.Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
43.Shokohi, G.H. (2017). Principles and principles of education. Astan Quds Razavi. 35th edition. [in Persian]
44.Shafiee, N. (2016). Basics of adult education. Islamic Azad University of Islamshahr. 3rd edition. [in Persian]
 
45.Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. In Educational Leadership (pp. 4-14).
46.Tallvid, M., Lundin, J., & Lindström, B. (2012, March). Using TPACK for analysing teachers’ task design: Understanding change in a 1:1 laptop setting. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4773-4780). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
47.Tseng, J. J., Lien, Y. J., & Chen, H. J. (2016). Using a teacher support group to develop teacher knowledge of Mandarin teaching via web conferencing technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.903978.
48.Wei, X., Chow, M. K., Huang, L., Huang, X., & Cheng, G. (2023). Teacher evaluation in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review of SSCI journal publications from 2012 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(9), 7280.